class="reversehighlighted">ning time exceptionally long and therefore poorly serves UBL. It saves 2 reversals at PUNE and DD as well. It will make the train reach NZM at same time as 12649 and improve end to end patronage. Also it reduces fog effect since it is not so severe in this route via BRC-KOTA. Wrote this to SWR in pgportal, but they denied diverting and gave same reply as yours. <br />Instead of rerouting 12649, a new SF train on the YPR-SVDK premium route should be started which will serve BAY to NDLS.<br />12649 is now serving the capital of karnataka well in form of a non premium connection to NDLS along with KK, therefore its diversion will end up being a loss for karnataka itself, its quotas can be changed so that maximum is for end to end passengers. <br />Frequency of swarna jayanti express MYS-NZM can be increased and if possible go via BJP to give MYS a direct connection to BJP than Gol gumbaz via SBC. <br />It would be great if these demands are also taken up.

Even Maharashtra SK starts from Mumbai and does not serve Maharashtra apart from Mumbai, similarly KSK serves only bangalore as a...
more...

non premium connection to NDLS.

class="reversehighlighted"> under GNWL, most seats in KK are upto KPG and reduces quota in the remaining leg. This will ensure YG, GR, RC, WADI get better quotas to and from SBC and NDLS. Giving a dedicated RLWL will probably help and is the fastest solution than rerouting 12649.

class="reversehighlighted">egin on this route.

class="reversehighlighted"> tri weekly will give major boost to connectivity. IMO, at least one of these trains should go via BRC-KOTA to save time, and reduce load on the gujarat trains. I had written to Pgportal but they shot down the request hence the anger with SWR! the pune-DD route unnecessarily increases running time for these trains with two reversals, plus all of them go via that route only be it goa, ksk, KOP-NZM, and swarna jayanti. So one train via BRC-KOTA will not hurt passengers and give faster connectivity down south.

Karnataka has 3 pairs of sampark kranti- highest for any state in India and also runs 9 days a week ( 5 days +2 +2 days CDG...
more...

SK) which also is the highest. But these SKs serve other state, the 12629 and 22685 serve PUNE mainly and have slow speed and 12649 serves SC and SBC. So the name is in my opinion actually a misnomer, and more KSKs cannot be started and a new SF can be started to serve other parts of the state. Anyways SK have normal SF priority and few stops, so a normal or even ACSF will be a good option with no flexi fare.

class="reversehighlighted">R, but they dont act. 12629 serves BGM but is too slow. Its earlier timetable sharing slot with 12649 from ET was better.

class="reversehighlighted"> The SUR-WADI-GTL line has many trains than MRJ-BGM and SUR-BJP. And all those areas are under SWR. A MRJ-SBC SF is much more needed than RC-SBC SF.<br />RC means raichur and rani chennamma, good coincidence!

class="reversehighlighted">from NDLS and SBC. New trains can be demanded on the new line. Karnataka should first get complete justice from SWR and develop regions under it properly like BJP, BAY, BGM, then expect it from other zones like SCR, CR and SR.

class="reversehighlighted">ly needed to connect parts of karnataka to delhi. 12781/82 Swarna jayanti should be made daily and will relieve load on goa express and give good connectivity. SWR should have used the ICF rake of 16501 than giving it to NWR!

Why to bring MAQ everywhere? Ask VSG People how they are ill treated by SWR, youll get your answer.<br />And for bringing majn,...
more...

at least it has two dedicated SF between mumbai and majn. And a SF between mumbai and Bangalore is still not there!

class="reversehighlighted">ure which I myself have taken.<br />Yes everything I write is against kannadigas? Great. Look who is immature and insecure! Why cannot i say you are against tamilians? <br />If tnstc writes it that way does spelling of bangalore change?