I was just wandering around this station forum, and I just see the ones which had nice discussions are being auto archived due to objections.
So lets say, if someone has a different point of view, just because he has a different point of view there is no room for his thoughts on this forum? And the funniest thing is, bashing on the original poster via "Objection button" by usage of the terms which say "Fake Account" and "Mentally Retarded" and surprisingly they are being considered as a valid objection.
If the poster...
more... was really a fake account, do you think they will have so many posts against their name? All the senseless and cheap reasons are being provided, just to stop the discussion which is against a bunch of people's views.
The most common objection raised is "Controversial"- yes it is controversial issue, and it is controversial only because of the people who kept on opposing his views. If you do not have enough points to disprove the original poster, its pretty evident that the "Objection" is being used only to get the discussion closed. And if don't you have enough reasons to disprove the original poster, then I don't understand why this becomes a "Controversial Topic" ever.
The usage of "Objection" is really going wrong and I feel there must be strict moderation for the users who use the "Objection" just to get the post archived.
CC:
#AdminRegards,
Prithvi Raj.
PS: Its not a fake account, and if you have something to object, so please do it by "replying" on this post, not by clicking the "Objection" button and writing "Controversy" "Fake Account" "Mentally Retarded" etc.