new
1. not needed coz it is not that big a crowd, and like u said cape rmm is there.
2. yes possible, dependent on other factors
3. not much useful, but if passengers can be clubbed/extended, then its fine
4....
more... can be via njt or by extn of puu mdu exp to ms via tj [considering limited coaches restrictions in puu sct ghats]
5. not needed, owing to cape dibru getting frequency increases [hoping it will be daily soon]
6. can be done by increasing freq of kcvl ubl if needed [if demand arises]
7. not required
8. can be tried
freq increase
1. will clog majn, operationally problematic
2. yes, if demand exists and if existing occupancy is good beyond ypr
3. not a very required one, instead it can be clubbed with slots of ers nzm drnt and ksk maybe [together a single daily slot]
4. can be done [not sure about occupancy] and it can be made a signle kcvl smvt via dpj/kjm [assuming one swr can transfer rake here and kcvl can maintain]
5,6,7. not reqd, handled by cape dibru freq increase
8. possible with rake integration with nethravati
extn
1. not required at all [esp a 14 coacher], peak time at tvc and operationally not possible
2. not required; alternatively, the trains tvc nzm weeklies [3 of them] could be clubbed as a single tvc baramulla/srinagar/svdk triweekly via pnvl adi aii jp ggn dec umb cdg ldh jat
3. nop, doesnt work that way, esp with just behind qln mail
4. yes, possible. should be done.
5. not required if tvc tbm via mainline comes up/puu mdu exp is extended via mainline
6. not required