There are too many trains with intermediate PT quota to be called as exception. I am reiterating it that nobody asked SUR to do any quota alteration. It was not good for any of the stations. Why do you think SUR kept only 29 seats? There should be some data which showed it must be enough. All stations under GNWL was perfectly fine.
Yes, it's not just about quota, if it was just about quota we wouldn't have asked for short termination. There has to be many reasons right? Please go through my first post again and think if they are invalid. We don't have to fight or attack each other personally. We can discuss the matter with maturity (of course,...
more... we are doing it now). If you think the case of 22133/34 is not sufficient we can extend the discussion to other areas as well. We never said GR is an island station. When topic such as "other station vs xyz" comes up, it's better to hear them out than suppressing them!