Height of Stupidity nahi hai Yeh Logical Decision bolte hai ise.
There are some restriction On that Section.
1. BOTH OF THEM needs to change Loco at AF , AF loco Siding is on PF1 Side , When loco is changed PF-2/3 needs to be Vacant so that Loco Change can Happen dur to space Restriction.
a. As other train...
more... is also an Important Train it needs to be placed only on PF 1 , here also One Logic is that it's also a 24 coacher train , At AF only Pf 1 is capable of handling that coacher train. of 2 and 3 are too short.
2. As mentioned only PF 2 and 3 are left out,of which if PF 3 is occupied , PF2 needs to be Vacant so Loco,Change can happen One At A Time.
IF Sealdah Ajmer was allowed to Occupy pf 2 then Loco Change was impossible due,to Bloacked of Line due to Coaches. So only way was to Let PF2 Vacant and Perform LC for one train at a time.
Earlier due to Incidents of passengers falling on Track due to Short lenght , DRM Agra instructed to minimize usage of PF 2/3 for 24 Coaches train and use only PF1 wherever possible.