On one side what you are arguing is true, But you are not understanding what I am trying to say. For a moment lets forget my argument that one train has 9 3A coaches, the other had 10, so train with 9 coaches should have been given that extra coach to bring it on par with the other train before the other train is augmented. Lets just see the w/l, AC had 30 (lets neglect the reason for for less w/l that it already has more coaches, more booking etc) and Duronto had 150. It means 30 more people wanted to travel in AC Exp but didn't get a chance and in Duronto 150 more people wanted to travel but they didn't get a chance. So, Duronto should have got one more coach where more people would have got benefited.
As...
more...

far as facts are concerned, I never underestimate the knowledge/ reality awareness of officials which you think I may be doing, but how many time we have not seen a decision being taken politically and not sticking just to facts or welfare of people? Simple example being the fund allocation for doubling of PUNE - MRJ Line (Showing negative rate of return) to that of most saturated GTL-YNK line? Or for 3rd line construction of SC-BZA-VSKP line to that of 2nd line construction of GTL-YNK line? We can't just say that they don't know the facts. I know it's completely different argument and I don't want to get into that, but all I want to say is sometimes it's just that decisions are of political nature and people are not given justice.