Some admins and monitors are very good, helpful and neutral.
-
Some are not. They cook their own rules, defend plagiarism. This disappoints many members/contributors. Any complaint is dismissed as small issue not worth the debate by moderator (though he agrees we are right).
-
Abusive...
more...

bloggers who the moderator talks about are rare, no member quits the site because of them.
It is biased decisions and different rule for different members, that disappoints a lot of members/contributors of the site. Moderator seems to have too many complaints to handle so he seems to turn a blind eye when bias is displayed.
-
I am a visitor to this site since 2010. Member now. Hope this site with open flouting of rules and ethics/norms should not become a plagiarist den. Then all credibility and interest will die.

Majority of them are good but tell me where we don't have any trouble makers? Here in IRI also we have some infamous people.
Some people have bad habit of boasting their half baked knowledge over some genuine person with proofs, as they're TLM moderator & try to justify their deeds without any solid proofs, which is clear suppression of truths, further it leads to bitterness & finally such genuine members ceases to come.
Plus making of TL monitors too are not the way transparent, as many old genuine members are left out...
more...

to make way for some sycophants. (well this is a private site, so authority of it rests with moderators, so I won't complain).