Kamayani slack?? Can u detail where further just after IGP/NK? NK-BSL, 4 stop in between, 63 KMPH. Later on its slower cz of stops & schedule OT from Mangala!! Now a train with stops too need to give same AVG alike non-stop train?? Lashkar with 2 stop is @ 90 KMPH (NK-BSL) while NZM-LTT AC @ 93 with no stop!!
Further, if LTT-NZM wasnt having any slack, it wouldnt have been @ BPL 20 Min Late after departing NK 35 Min late!!
If Kamayani is late to arrive IGP/NK, so is LTT-NZM AC...
more...

SF!! But Kamayani remain late afterwards while LTT-NZM SF make-up some delay!! That means, Kamayni TT been defined as per AC conversion, decades back (when it will be AC, Kamayani too will report on time or make up in between)?
Rajyarani dont need Loco change and so do Jan-Shatabdi (even no banker attachment/detachment), but thy dont jump over train which kept idle @ Kasara (Banker attachment) & IGP (Banker detachment & Loco change)..This i witness while traveling JBP Garib Rath (& in TT too, JS trail till MMR)
PS: Its not just Kamayani or Rajyarani, many trains with more stop are slightly slower then LTT-NZM AC SF!! Further, i think am talking about LTT-NK Section, not FZR-MOGA one!!

Friend, Kamayani stoppage @ IGP is just 5 Mins & Kamayani. With 3rd halt, its making 54 as AVG till NK!!
LTT-NZM, with second halt, is making 57 as AVG!!
How come in working TT, kamayani got 20 mins for Loco change & with approx same run, AC Exp dont have tht slack?? Seems u guyz are in-charge for TT definition!!
That simply means,...
more...

after Loco change requirement gets omitted, Kamayani will becum 20 mins faster in between LTT-NK & LTT-NZM AC SF will remain as it is!!! Gr8 TT!!
Rajyarani dont need loco change and even no banker, but still is slower than Kamayani (LTT-MMR) & lot other trains (which need Loco/banker attach/detach)!! So means, train with 20 mins Loco change slack @ IGP are in fact faster to one with no loco/banker 20 mins slack!!
PS: U self defined ur blog as baseless!!