Passenger 1: Can/Mod (Booking Status: W/L 25,RLGN)
Passenger 2: Can/Mod (Booking Status: W/L 26,RLGN)
Passenger 3: Can/Mod (Booking Status: W/L 27,RLGN)
Chart NOT Prepared
I have paid for an India Railway Journey ticket from Dehradun (DDN), to Howrah JN (HWH) while there were adequate berths availability but desired to board from Haridwar Jn (HW) - a station after Dehradun (DDN). Adequate berths were still available even after my said booking was confirmed.
However, instead of adequate berth availability, before and even after making required full payment for the journey between Dehradun (DDN) and Howrah JN (HWH), we have denied confirmed berths by Indian Railways (IRCTC) since, as it appeared to me, that we have desired to board from a station after initial station Dehradun (DDN).
So, the entire observation made me confused that when Indian Railway (IRCTC) accepted payment for a Reservation Ticket between Dehradun (DDN) to Howrah JN (HWH) stations, then how can they (IRCTC) allow someone else to avail the same berth already reserved and paid by me and even keep allowing the same person to occupy same berth even after I board in the train from Haridwar Jn (HW)?
So after realising said action, later, I was compelled to cancel my ticket and lost Rs. 80/- towards IRCTS Charge and others for such compelled cancellation of tickets also suffered loss in term of time and Internet connection.
Therefore, I don not find such of an action by a statute like Indian Railway or IRCTC is reasonable in anyway but an arbitrary and unreasonable one. Such action violates my Fundamental Rights too.
Is there anyone here who can enlighten me REASONABLY that my said interpretation about Indian Railway is incorrect?